| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	
	
		Tearlach Royal Member of BonBon
  
  Joined: 04 Oct 2008 Posts: 2914
 
  | 
		 | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Artyom Derison Rank: Super Veteran
  
  Joined: 04 Jul 2011 Posts: 1665
 
  | 
		 | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Tearlach Royal Member of BonBon
  
  Joined: 04 Oct 2008 Posts: 2914
 
  | 
		 | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Symphony Royal Member of BonBon
  
  Joined: 13 Apr 2008 Posts: 2620
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:17 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Caroline wrote: | 	 		  
 
And, I do find one of the more cuter pictures Vanessa has drawn is where Caroline is helping a customer light his cigar, and the customer is like... 50% taller than Caroline is.  Not really sure why, just... that it appeals to me. )) | 	  
 
I like seeing these height differences in the comic as well. Especially when the Royal avatars interact with others characters. I can't wait to see how Constance compares to Red.    _________________ Constance Mayflower's bio
 
 
Constance Mayflower's diary
 
 
The Mayflower Diaries | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Eechironin Rank: Senior Member
 
  Joined: 14 Jun 2010 Posts: 262
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:20 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Miss Scorpia wrote: | 	 		  
 
Oh cool!!! Thanks for the list.
 
Hmmm.... I stick with 6'3". | 	  
 
 
(looks up at Miss Scorpia)     
 
 
 
 
      _________________
  
 
"That which is denied becomes that which is most desired, and that which is hidden becomes that which is most interesting. Consequently, a great deal of time and energy is spent trying to get at what is being kept from you."-John Denver | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		dragonfly Rank: Super Veteran
 
  Joined: 30 Sep 2009 Posts: 9138
 
  | 
		 | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		furrynerd Rank: Super Veteran
  
  Joined: 07 Nov 2009 Posts: 2846
 
  | 
		 | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Symphony Royal Member of BonBon
  
  Joined: 13 Apr 2008 Posts: 2620
 
  | 
		 | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Kiala_Tiagra Royal Member of BonBon
  
  Joined: 23 Jan 2009 Posts: 1120
 
  | 
		 | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		henkcobra Royal Member of BonBon
  
  Joined: 28 Jan 2008 Posts: 4122
 
  | 
		 | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Symphony Royal Member of BonBon
  
  Joined: 13 Apr 2008 Posts: 2620
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 6:19 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Kiala_Tiagra wrote: | 	 		  | well after seeing miss symphony feet to cm conversion i think my character is... around 5'6" or 5'7" | 	  
 
I've included your fursona as 5' 10"(for now) because that's what your description in the avatar request thread says, though I personally view her as shorter than that. 5' 6" or 5' 7" sounds right to me. _________________ Constance Mayflower's bio
 
 
Constance Mayflower's diary
 
 
The Mayflower Diaries | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		henkcobra Royal Member of BonBon
  
  Joined: 28 Jan 2008 Posts: 4122
 
  | 
		 | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Caroline Royal Member of BonBon
  
  Joined: 22 Dec 2008 Posts: 2173
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 12:35 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				((Hey Symphony,
 
 
Odd sort of fashion / height question based on you recording the heights of the girls.
 
 
Were heels common in the late 1890s?  What I mean is, I've seen the old advertisements for ladies shoes, and they have a spot of heel on them, but... nothing more than like an inch or so.  Even most of the heels that Vanessa draws her girls with are more of a working height, and not a glamour height.  A "working height" being an inch or so, while "glamour" is more along a 3 inch or higher, so as to make the girl appear that much taller.  So... were ladies shoes of the time pretty much flats?  )) | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		kommy Royal Member of BonBon
  
  Joined: 07 Sep 2006 Posts: 1000
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 4:25 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I'm no expert, but I suspect that shorter heels were the fashion then.  And I imagine that they were not strongly made enough to support really large heeled shoes without some notable expense, anyway.
 
 
Besides, I think small and adorable was considered possibly more appealing than tall and striking. _________________ "Doktor!  Are you sure this will work?!"  "HAHA!  I HAVE NO IDEA!" | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Rune174 Royal Member of BonBon
  
  Joined: 29 May 2009 Posts: 6010
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 9:30 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Considering that men enjoyed women smaller since it allowed them to assert more dominance, rather than taller where it would take that sense of pride away. _________________
   | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Symphony Royal Member of BonBon
  
  Joined: 13 Apr 2008 Posts: 2620
 
  | 
		 | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		 |